Thursday, December 17, 2009

Violence

About a month ago it was the international day for elimination of violence against women. Or something like that. Good day to have, though I wonder if it would be better to stick with a day celebrating non-violence. It's less of a mouthful, more positive, and applicable to more situations. Men get violence used against them too. But lets not get picky. So I wrote down a couple of thoughts of violence on that day, and today I'm putting them up on the web.

To truly appreciate violence we should realize it goes beyond physical harm. Violence can come in many forms, it doesn't have to be obvious, it can be subtle. Today I want to look at what the root of subtle, non-physical violence. It probably doesn't encompass everything related to violence, it's a big picture, but hopefully this sheds light on part of the picture.

I think the it occurs you're asserting your own will against someone else. Like controlling someone by using guilt or their own fears and insecurities to get what you want. Even small discussions can contain some violence; when your objective is no longer to discuss ideas, but to destroy your opponents argument, the discussion is a violent one.

Now, some people are naturally violent. Actually, I'm think most - if not all - people are violent. Not overly physically violent, but we all have violent tendencies. We have a tendency to push our own agendas and ignore other peoples agendas. Fortunately, most of us only do this in arguments, and usually we don't push our own agenda so far that it explicitly hurts others. Unfortunately, some people tend to do this regularly, and many people have done it at one point or another in their life.

And this is why we need to be a little violent ourselves. Because we need to be able to push back to protect our own agenda. You have authority over your own life, and should defend you own rights, otherwise you will be vulnerable to violence. But the problem here is that if we get used to responding to violence with violence, we run the risk of letting violence become a habit, and become violent ourselves.

So I think the antidote to all of this is is to respect people's authority over their own lives, and going one step further, and being committed to protecting others authority. Defend people's rights, all the while avoiding overstepping your boundaries. At times you may need to be a little, violent?, to protect others, but beware- this can be especially seductive, as sometimes it can feel like you're being the hero, but in reality you're the villain. The key to this is to be committed to the wellbeing of others, especially those who you disagree with. That means you're not a hero, they're not a villain. You're both people who need to learn.

If you're committed to the wellbeing of others, especially those who you disagree with, and respecting their authority over their own lives, I'd say it's a good step towards a non-violence.

4 comments:

  1. I am coming to think that 'personal sovereignty' becoming a definining characteristic of our era. That is, questions like:

    - can I choose who to marry?
    - can I choose what I do to my own body? what chemicals I put in? who I allow 'access' to it?
    - is it my choice whether or not I put my body through an unplanned pregnancy?

    Currently, governments tend to do personal violence on a bunch of questions like these. And many individual groups do their best to follow suit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, it's worth mentioning that all too often, physical violence is the tool used to keep people in line on the above questions – "you don't have authority over your own life, and if you act like you do there will be consequences." See, for example, the victim-blaming that happens in cases of rape or gay-bashing; underneath is the assumption, frequently, that "they deserved it," usually for some nebulous stepping-out-of-line reason. Of course, it's frequently disguised under phrases like "he should have known the risks of that kind of lifestyle" or "she shouldn't have been walking home alone."

    And then, we're right back to the invisible fist.

    ReplyDelete
  3. mmmm... good thoughts. Kinda was just thinking of interpersonal violence, but you connect the dots to institutional violence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Currently challenging me, incidentally, is transgender(-ism? -ness?). I have only just realised that if someone claims to be a woman, it doesn't matter how much they look like a man – I do not get to argue about it. I do not have the right to define their gender for them. To insist on treating a transgendered woman as a man is an act of violence.

    ReplyDelete